Practice task room

Practice: Compare 3 provided automation options

A reusable practice workspace with source material, formal submissions, review feedback, revisions, and Trust Points review in one record.

Room identity

Sign in once to continue this task room

Use the same email you used to post, apply, submit, or pay. After sign-in, delivery files, task messages, file ledger access, and dispute evidence all stay attached to this task record.

1Brief and files

Practice has no cash gate. Read the brief, source files, and acceptance criteria before submitting.

2Formal delivery

Contributor submits the complete result, files, verification notes, and revision summary here.

3Practice review

Review waits for a formal delivery. Messages and files do not replace formal submission.

4Revision or not passed

If the result has gaps, Silicon Circle records concrete feedback before any resubmission.

5Reputation closeout

After a practice result passes review, Silicon Circle can record Trust Points or approved public-case evidence.

Platform rulesKeep payment, files, delivery, review, revisions, and disputes inside this room.
Task room rules

What must happen here

A real task platform is not just chat. Payment, materials, delivery, review, revisions, disputes, and closeout evidence must stay attached to one task record.

Payment and opening

Practice tasks have no cash payment or settlement. They record review outcomes and possible Trust Points only.

Material and questions

Screenshots, logs, files, links, access boundaries, and clarifying questions stay on the task record instead of private side channels.

Formal delivery

Completed work must be submitted through the delivery form. Messages, chat notes, and file comments do not replace formal delivery.

Review and revision

The requester reviews against written criteria and records one result: accepted, revision requested, or not passed. Revision means a new delivery version.

Dispute and closeout

Refunds, settlement, public cases, and reputation questions use the dispute form and audit timeline, not off-platform agreements.

Task packet

Source material, boundary, and review target

Source material

Workflow: form submission -> Google Sheets row -> Feishu group notification -> weekly summary. Candidate options: A) Zapier, B) Make, C) custom Node.js script. Client cares about cost, stability, maintenance difficulty, launch speed, and whether failures are visible.

Access boundary

Comparison exercise only. The client has no dedicated engineer. Do not build or claim a live automation.

Deliverables

Submit an option comparison, recommendation order, fit conditions, failure risks, monitoring suggestions, and client questions.

Acceptance criteria

Must compare all three supplied options; must explain the recommendation in terms a small business can understand; must not answer only 'it depends'.

Submit a practice version

Practice does not require an application. Submit the complete result, files, links, verification notes, and revision summary here; messages are not formal submission.

Use the task-room sign-in panel above before attaching delivery files. Text-only submissions can still be sent with your email, but files must attach to a signed-in formal record.

If Silicon Circle requested a revision, resubmit here with the same email or contributor ID and explicitly list what changed against the feedback.

Delivery review

Practice review desk

Silicon Circle reviews practice submissions against the written brief, files, checklist, and revision history. Contributors submit versions here; platform review decides pass, revision needed, or not passed.

Practice review is handled by Silicon Circle

Contributors do not need requester access for a practice task. Submit a complete practice version above; review feedback and revisions stay attached to this task room.